Clements is a nice foil for Upton. A political scientist at Western Michigan University, last year he said that it was Upton’s turnaround on climate change that caused him to run for Congress. “He used to say we needed to regulate greenhouse gases, but it seems to get promoted to the chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, you have to cut a deal,” he told E&ENews.
Things really heated up earlier this week, when a poll conducted by Hamilton Campaigns for the Clements campaign found Clements in a statistical dead heat with Upton. Surveying 400 registered voters, the poll showed Clements down by only four points, 47 to 43 percent, but within the margin of error of 4.9 points.
A poll done by the same firm during the first week of October showed Clements down 15 points.
On Wednesday the Cook Political Report, a well respected political tracker, downgraded Upton’s chances from “solid” to “likely.”
Clements is not only closing in the polls but also closing the wide financial gap between himself, an unknown outsider, and Upton, an industry-friendly insider. This is in large part thanks to Lawrence Lessig’s MAYDAY super PAC, which aims to end “money’s corrupting influence in politics.”
After committing $1.5 million into defeating Upton earlier this month, MAYDAY doubled down earlier this week and said they were putting another $650,000 into the race. Lessig even wrote an open letter on Wednesday describing the PAC’s motivations:
When it comes to Fred Upton, the link between the people who fund his campaigns and the way he votes in Congress is crystal clear … Upton has taken $10 million in special interest PAC money over his career. He took $2.1 million from Big Oil and energy interests, and he voted to give away billions in subsidies for oil and gas companies. MAYDAY decided to work to defeat Fred Upton because he is the epitome of the modern corrupt politician.Read More at The 20-Year Congressional Incumbent Who Could Be Taken Down over His Position on Climate Change
No comments:
Post a Comment