Thursday, October 02, 2014

In FERC's Approval of Gas Exports, Climate Effects Get Glossed Over

Opponents of the proposed Cove Point natural gas export terminal in Maryland protest in front of FERC headquarters in July 2014. The plan, approved on Sept. 29 by FERC, faces a legal challenge by environmental groups who say the agency improperly left out climate change impacts in its environmental review. (Credit: Chesapeake Climate Action Network) Click to enlarge.
Environmental and community groups on Tuesday assailed federal approval of the Cove Point liquefied natural gas export project, arguing that regulators glossed over the climate change consequences.  They vowed to challenge the decision through a regulatory appeal or in the courts.

"The groups that have been opposing this facility for more than a year have no intention of quitting and conceding this," said Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, one of several nonprofit groups fighting the Lusby, Md. LNG project.  "There are legal steps before us next."

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved the Cove Point LNG export project late Monday.  It imposed 79 conditions on its construction that regulators said would mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts.  Those conditions were based on an environmental assessment of the project, a less-rigorous review than what is called for in an environmental impact statement.

FERC's action allows Dominion Cove Point to liquefy and export as much as 5.75 million metric tons of U.S. gas per year from the terminal.  The commission said project owner Dominion Resources Inc. proposes to complete construction in time to begin exports in June 2017.  In separate actions, the Department of Energy conditionally approved gas exports from the terminal to any country, providing there are no U.S. trade prohibitions.

In FERC's Approval of Gas Exports, Climate Effects Get Glossed Over

No comments:

Post a Comment