Other things are needed, especially technology development, but those things will be hastened by a rising carbon fee.
So why is an agreement on a carbon fee at Paris in December 2015 not a foregone conclusion?
The old excuse, that it would be costly, has been shot down. A steadily rising carbon fee, if it is revenue neutral via 100% dispersal of the funds to the public, stimulates the economy, increasing jobs and the GDP (see REMI study commissioned by Citizens Climate Lobby).
The problem is a combination of (1) widespread ignorance of what is needed, and (2) the power (money) of special interests who prefer the status quo. Overcoming such formidable obstacles requires a multi-prong strategy, as we have discussed, e.g., in The Wheels of Justice.
The organization that I now direct, Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions (CSAS), aims to contribute to that strategy. We want to
- help advance the climate science, because uncertainty remains about the nature and speed of human-made climate effects, as well as the best ways to minimize climate change and climate impacts,
- describe research progress with a clarity that helps achieve broader public awareness, and
- “connect the dots” all the way from the basic climate science to the implications for policy solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment