My father, Stewart Udall, was determined to make science a cornerstone of federal decision-making. The person he hired as the Department's first science adviser was a distinguished oceanographer, Roger Revelle, who recognized even then the looming dangers of climate change. Revelle collaborated with Johnson's top science advisers on a prescient report entitled "Restoring the Quality of Our Environment."
This 1965 report from the President's Science Advisory Committee devoted a chapter to "Carbon Dioxide From Fossil Fuels - The Invisible Pollutant." The scientists wrote, "Man is unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment" that "may be sufficient by the year 2000 to produce measurable and perhaps marked changes in climate," as well as sea level rise "a hundred times greater than present worldwide rates."
The scientists' concerns clearly influenced Johnson who warned in a special message to Congress in 1965, that "this generation has altered the composition of the atmosphere on a global scale through ... a steady increase in carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels." He called on Congress to strengthen the Clean Air Act to permit the federal government to investigate and prevent air pollution.
Members went to the floor of the House and the Senate to echo Johnson's alarm. One even testified before the House Commerce Committee about the "unnerving" risk that "the increase in carbon dioxide ... may in time melt the polar ice caps" and "greatly raise the level of the oceans, thus dangerously shrinking the earth's land surface area."
That same year, Congress adopted what many of the nation's top environmental law professors now say may be the key to an economy-wide, market-based climate policy in the United States - the international air pollution provision of the Clean Air Act. The provision is surprisingly straightforward: if a pollutant meets an endangerment test and there is reciprocity with other nations, the Environmental Protection Agency can set emission reduction targets for the states, which they can meet using "economic incentives, such as fees, marketable permits, and auctions of emission rights."
The congressional drafters wrote that their goal was "to adopt a procedure whereby we can cooperate with foreign countries in cases involving endangerment of health or welfare." Legal experts maintain that after Paris, we can use this authority to tackle the ultimate international air pollutant: greenhouse gases.
Read more at A New (Old) Approach on Climate Change
No comments:
Post a Comment