Cutting Carbon Pollution Is the Key to Curbing Global Warming

There are some greenhouse gases that, when emitted, only stay in the atmosphere for a short time. There are other greenhouse gases (like carbon dioxide) that stay aloft for decades to centuries. Finally, there are some that stay airborne for an intermediate duration.  It has often been stated that we can “buy time” by focusing on short-lived greenhouse gases.  Reducing things like black carbon or methane can give us some extra years to get our act together on carbon dioxide.

But this suggestion is challenged in a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by Joeri Rogelj and his colleagues.  There are two major issues that suggest we really need to focus on the long-lived gases.  First, since short-lived gases only stay airborne for a brief period, any emissions that we make now will not impact the temperatures we can expect say in 2100.  Reducing our emissions of short lived gases will affect the rate of temperature increase in the next few years, but will have very little impact on the maximum temperature that will be obtained.  In fact, the present study is clear in stating,

Maximum temperature increases (peak warming) is to first order determined by the cumulative emissions of the long-lived greenhouse gases until the peak and by the annual emissions of the short-lived greenhouse gases at the time of the peak.

This doesn’t mean that reducing short-lived greenhouse gases isn’t important.  In fact, the short-lived gases become more important if we have already reduced carbon dioxide.  As stated in the paper,

Methane mitigation measures in the latter half of the century become important if carbon dioxide emissions have already been curbed, and warming thus peaks before 2100.  Early action on methane is less important for limiting warming to below 2C.

Read more at Cutting Carbon Pollution Is the Key to Curbing Global Warming